SCOTUS Kills Judge Dredd Style Regulators

Today is all about how SCOTUS killed regulators.


SCOTUS Kills Judge Dredd Style Regulators

Despite some major, major SCOTUS decisions that directly affect the crypto market — red is the only color on the screen. 😭 

In today’s Litepaper, we’re focusing on what is perhaps the biggest regulatory event for cryptocurrencies since, well, maybe ever. SCOTUS just neutered not only the SEC, but the entirety of U.S. regulatory agencies.

Before we dive in, here’s today’s crypto market heatmap:

And here’s a look at crypto’s total and altcoin market cap YTD:

SCOTUS Smack Down 👊

The U.S. Supreme Court has delivered a one-two punch to regulatory overreach, dismantling the notorious Chevron deference and ending the SEC’s Judge Dredd-style in-house courts. 🔫 

These rulings are a colossal win for the cryptocurrency industry and anyone sick of unelected bureaucrats running amok.

Chevron Deference: The End of Bureaucratic Carte Blanche

For decades, Chevron deference was the bureaucrats' trump card, allowing federal agencies to twist ambiguous laws to their advantage with minimal interference from the judiciary.

This doctrine, born from the 1984 case Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., gave agencies the kind of power that made even the most seasoned regulators salivate. 😋 

But the Supreme Court had enough. In Loper Bright Enterprises et al. v. Raimondo, the justices declared that judges should actually interpret laws themselves (imagine that) rather than rubber-stamping whatever nonsense agencies cooked up. This decision reclaims the judiciary’s role in defining the law, cutting down the bloated power of regulatory agencies, and keeping them in their lane.

How Chevron Deference Empowered the Bureaucratic Machine

Chevron deference was like having an “I win” button in a game, letting agencies interpret vague rules however they pleased. This meant:

  • Unlimited Interpretative Power: Agencies could bend rules to fit their whims.

  • Courts on Leash: Judges would nod along as long as the agency’s interpretation wasn’t completely off the rails. 🚃 

  • Regulatory Flexibility: Agencies could adapt regulations on the fly without pesky oversight.

  • Legal Stability (for Them): Agencies knew their rule-bending would likely stick.

The Death of the SEC’s In-House Kangaroo Courts

In another monumental decision, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy et al., the Supreme Court obliterated the SEC’s creepy Judge Dredd-esque in-house court system. For too long, the SEC has been playing prosecutor, judge, and jury, handing out penalties like candy without giving defendants their constitutional right to a jury trial.

George Jarkesy and his firm, Patriot28, got slapped with a $300,000 fine for alleged securities fraud in one of these sham courts and fought back, claiming a Seventh Amendment violation. The Court sided with Jarkesy. 🥳 

The Court’s Decision

Chief Justice Roberts stated that when the SEC seeks civil penalties, defendants are entitled to a jury trial. He pointed out that such penalties are punitive and, historically, would have been decided by a jury in a common law court. This ruling puts an end to the SEC’s kangaroo court, ensuring that significant penalties face proper judicial review and jury trials. 🦘 

Why This Is a Game-Changer for Crypto

  • Reining in Regulatory Bullies

    The Supreme Court’s decisions are a big win against the overreach of unelected bureaucrats. They ensure that agencies can’t arbitrarily interpret laws and impose penalties without judicial oversight. For the crypto industry, this means less fear of random, heavy-handed regulations. 🦌 

  • More Judicial Oversight

    With these rulings, courts will now be the primary interpreters of laws, and significant penalties will need to be decided by juries. This ensures a fairer and more balanced approach, preventing agencies from running roughshod over businesses. 📔 

  • Fair Play in Regulation

    These decisions level the playing field. Agencies now need clear laws and will face more judicial scrutiny, giving businesses a fair shot at operating without the looming threat of arbitrary penalties. ♎️ 

Preventing Regulatory Overreach

These Supreme Court rulings put the brakes on federal agency overreach by:

  • Killing Automatic Deference 

    Courts won’t just accept agency interpretations of vague laws.

  • Jury Trials for Big Penalties

    Significant fines now need a jury’s decision, not some shady in-house judge.

  • Restoring Judicial Independence

    Judges will use their own judgment to interpret laws, cutting down agency influence. ✂️ 

Final Thoughts

The Supreme Court’s rulings are a massive win for crypto. 👍️ 

By clipping the wings of regulatory agencies and demanding more judicial oversight, these decisions protect the crypto sector, from unchecked bureaucratic power.

This marks the beginning of a new era where laws are clearer, and the balance of power is restored. Cheers to accountability and a fairer regulatory landscape! 🚀 

Subscribe to keep reading

This content is free, but you must be subscribed to The Litepaper to continue reading.

I consent to receive newsletters via email. Sign Up Terms of Service.

Already a subscriber?Sign In.Not now